State of Quantum Hardware
A cross-vendor ranking of quantum devices, built from the public corpus of calibration snapshot s. Switch the ranking metric below; lower error and higher T1/T2 coherence are better. How the corpus works →
| Rank | Provider | Backend | best_2q_fidelity | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | ibm | ibm_torino | 0.9985 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #2 | ibm | ibm_osaka | 0.9973 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #3 | ibm | ibm_quebec | 0.9969 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #4 | ibm | ibm_sherbrooke | 0.9965 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #5 | ibm | ibm_brisbane | 0.9963 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #6 | ibm | ibm_hanoi | 0.9962 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #7 | ibm | ibm_kawasaki | 0.9959 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #8 | ibm | ibm_cairo | 0.9957 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #9 | ibm | ibm_mumbai | 0.9953 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |