State of Quantum Hardware
A cross-vendor ranking of quantum devices, built from the public corpus of calibration snapshot s. Switch the ranking metric below; lower error and higher T1/T2 coherence are better. How the corpus works →
| Rank | Provider | Backend | median_t2_us | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | ibm | ibm_quebec | 170.55 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #2 | ibm | ibm_sherbrooke | 170.01 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #3 | ibm | ibm_kawasaki | 150.76 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #4 | ibm | ibm_brisbane | 150.04 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #5 | ibm | ibm_torino | 140.94 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #6 | ibm | ibm_osaka | 139.96 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #7 | ibm | ibm_mumbai | 124.0 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #8 | ibm | ibm_hanoi | 117.35 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #9 | ibm | ibm_kyoto | 109.59 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #10 | ibm | ibm_cairo | 81.43 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |