State of Quantum Hardware
A cross-vendor ranking of quantum devices, built from the public corpus of calibration snapshot s. Switch the ranking metric below; lower error and higher T1/T2 coherence are better. How the corpus works →
| Rank | Provider | Backend | median_t1_us | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | ibm | ibm_quebec | 301.79 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #2 | ibm | ibm_osaka | 287.31 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #3 | ibm | ibm_sherbrooke | 278.42 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #4 | ibm | ibm_brisbane | 231.95 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #5 | ibm | ibm_kyoto | 220.66 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #6 | ibm | ibm_kawasaki | 193.77 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #7 | ibm | ibm_torino | 184.99 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #8 | ibm | ibm_hanoi | 137.54 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #9 | ibm | ibm_mumbai | 111.93 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |
| #10 | ibm | ibm_cairo | 96.95 | 2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00 |